Partial Nephrectomy for T1b/T2 Renal Mass: An Added Shift from Radical Nephrectomy
Main Article Content
Keywords
eGFR, large renal mass, nephrometry score, partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy
Abstract
The aim of our study was to show our short-term experience in managing large renal masses (cT1b/T2) through partial nephrectomy (PN) over the last 3 years. Retrospective data collection for all patients managed by PN for renal masses larger than 4 cm over the last 3 years. Epidemiological data were collected. Surgical data including surgical and ischemic times as well as intra and postoperative complications were collected. Pre- and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) data were collected and correlated as well as postoperative complications and recurrence. We could identify 47 patients managed by PN for radiologically confirmed >4 cm renal masses. The mean age of the patients was 55.7 ± 13.4, including 29 males and 18 females. Masses were T1b and T2 in 40 and 7 patients, respectively. The mean tumor size was 6.2 ± 1.5 cm. Using renal nephrometry score; 8, 28, and 11 had low, moderate, and high complexity, respectively. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was identified in 42 patients. Five patients out of 42 cancerous cases (12%) had pathological T3 RCC. The mean preoperative and postoperative eGFR were 89.09 ± 12.41 and 88.50 ± 10.50, respectively (P 0.2). The median follow-up was 14 months and within that short time, no patient had evidence for cancer recurrence. PN for large renal masses is safe in experienced hands and should be attempted in a higher percentage of patients, regardless of the tumor complexity. No cancer recurrence or deterioration of renal function was observed within our short-term follow-up.
References
2. Touijer K, Jacqmin D, Kavoussi LR, et al. The expanding role of partial nephrectomy: A critical analysis of indications, results, and complications. Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):214–22. 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.019
3. Liao X, Qiu S, Wang W, et al. Partial nephrectomy vs cryoablation for T1a renal cell carcinoma: A comparison of survival benefit stratified by tumour size. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;59:221–226. 10.1016/j.canep.2019.02.016
4. Mir MC, Derweesh I, Porpiglia F, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T2 renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):606–17. 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060
5. Long CJ, Canter DJ, Kutikov A, et al. Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥ 7 cm: Technical, oncological and functional outcomes. BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1450–6. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10608.x
6. Badalato GM, Kates M, Wisnivesky JP, et al. Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach. BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1457–62. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10597.x
7. Crépel M, Jeldres C, Sun M, et al. A population-based comparison of cancer-control rates between radical and partial nephrectomy for T1A renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2010 Oct;76(4):883–8. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.028
8. Crépel M, Jeldres C, Perrotte P, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery is equally effective to radical nephrectomy for T1BN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: A population-based assessment. Urology. 2010 Feb;75(2):271–5. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.098
9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2): 205–13. 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
10. Klett DE, Tsivian M, Packiam VT, et al. Partial versus radical nephrectomy in clinical T2 renal masses. Int J Urol. 2021 Nov;28(11):1149–54. 10.1111/iju.14664
11. Deng W, Chen L, Wang Y, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for large (≥ 7 cm) renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol. 2019 Apr;37(4):263–72. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.12.015
12. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Sep;7(9):735–40. 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70803-8
13. Delto JC, Paulucci D, Helbig MW, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for large renal masses: a multi-institutional series. BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):908–15. 10.1111/bju.14139
14. Huang R, Zhang C, Wang X, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical T2 or higher stage renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 10;11:680842. 10.3389/fonc.2021.680842
15. Bi L, Zhang C, Li K, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 8;8(10):e75050. 10.1371/journal.pone.0075050
16. Yang C, Liao Z. Comparison of radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2018;101(2):175–83. 10.1159/000490576