A Decade of Surgical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma with IVC Thrombus and Bilateral Renal Tumors: Emphasis on Auto-transplantation

Main Article Content

Abdul Rouf Khwaja
Aamir Mushtaq
Younis Mushtaq
Arif Hamid
Sajad Mali
Sajad Parra
Saqib Mehdi
Faheem ul Islam
Akil Lateif

Keywords

Renal cell cancer, autotransplant, IVC thrombus

Abstract

To assess the surgical outcomes and techniques in managing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus and bilateral renal tumors with a focus on the role of autotransplantation in complex cases, this retrospective study analyzed 58 patients treated at our center between 2013 and 2023 for RCC with tumor thrombus extending into the IVC and, in some cases, the right atrium (RA). Surgical management included radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy with techniques adapted to thrombus level. For level I and II thrombi, innovative occluding maneuvers were used to control the contralateral renal vein. For level IV thrombi, a beating heart technique combined with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was employed. Of the 10 patients with bilateral renal tumors, 2 underwent autotransplantation and 8 underwent bilateral partial nephrectomy. In this 10-year retrospective study of 58 patients with either RCC with venous tumor extension or bilateral RCC, 40 males and 18 females, with a mean age of 66 ± 8 years. Tumor involvement was predominantly right-sided (72.4%). Thrombus levels included 53.44% Level I, 25.9% Level II, and 3.4% Level IV. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were minimal, affecting 10 patients; patients with Level I thrombus had a better survival rate; and one patient with Level IV thrombus died postoperatively. The mean blood loss was 360 mL and the mean operative time was 195 minutes. Histopathology revealed clear cell carcinoma in 65.5% of cases. Among the 10 patients with bilateral renal tumors, autotransplantation and partial nephrectomies resulted in excellent renal preservation and favorable outcomes. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy for RCC with venous tumor extension. Tailored surgical techniques, including autotransplantation for bilateral tumors, resulted in excellent outcomes with minimal complications. Personalized surgical strategies were key to preserving renal function and improving survival in complex RCC cases.

Abstract 292 | PDF Downloads 204 HTML Downloads 0 XML Downloads 7

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. 10.3322/caac.21708

2. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bedke J, Capitanio U, Dabestani S, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 update. Eur Urol. 2022;82(4):399–410. 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006

3. Ricketts CJ, De Cubas AA, Fan H, Smith CC, Lang M, Reznik E, et al. The cancer genome atlas comprehensive molecular characterization of renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2018;23(1):313–26e5.

4. Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Cheville JC, Zincke H. The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus. BJU Int. 2004;94(1):33–41. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04897.x

5. Metwalli AR, Linehan WM. Nephron-sparing surgery for multifocal and hereditary renal tumors. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(5):466–73. 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000094

6. Janssen MWW, Linxweiler J, Philipps I, Butow Z, Siemer S, Stockle M, et al. Kidney autotransplantation after nephrectomy and work bench surgery as an ultimate approach to nephron-sparing surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):35. 10.1186/s12957-018-1338-1

7. Crafa F, Rossetti ARR, Striano A, Baiamonte M, Esposito F. Ex vivo nephron-sparing surgery and kidney autotransplantation for renal tumors. J Surg Case Rep. 2021;2021(2):rjab004. 10.1093/jscr/rjab004

8. Russo P. Renal cell carcinoma: Presentation, staging, and surgical treatment. Semin Oncol. 2000;27(2):160–76.

9. Klatte T, Pantuck AJ, Riggs SB, Kleid MD, Shuch B, Zomorodian N, et al. Prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extension. J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 1):1189–95; discussion 95. 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.134

10. Haidar GM, Hicks TD, El-Sayed HF, Davies MG. Treatment options and outcomes for caval thrombectomy and resection for renal cell carcinoma. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017;5(3):430–6. 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.12.011

11. Gu L, Peng C, Li H, Jia T, Chen X, Wang H, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024;196:104316. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104316

12. Cai W, Huang J, Yuan Y, Hu X, Li M, Kong W, et al. Sunitinib or sorafenib as neoadjuvant therapy may not improve the survival outcomes of renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus. Urol Int. 2018;101(4):391–9. 10.1159/000492723

13. Hannan R, Margulis V, Chun SG, Cannon N, Kim DW, Abdulrahman RE, et al. Stereotactic radiation therapy of renal cancer inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;16(5):657–61. 10.1080/15384047.2015.1026506

14. Novick AC, Jackson CL, Straffon RA. The role of renal autotransplantation in complex urological reconstruction. J Urol. 1990;143(3):452–7. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39988-3

15. Artiles Medina A, Gomez Dos Santos V, Diez Nicolas V, Hevia Palacios V, Ruiz Hernandez M, Laso Garcia I, et al. Kidney autotransplantation and orthotopic kidney transplantation: Two different approaches for complex cases. Adv Urol. 2022;2022:9299397. 10.1155/2022/9299397